Marlon was pursued by Elizabeth Taylor, but Marlon was reportedly not interested because her ass was supposedly "too small."
Marlon Brando: Hollywood God, Voice of the Oppressed, Weirdo Freak
This site is dedicated to honoring and getting better acquainted with one of the greatest yet enigmatic and eccentric artists in American history
Monday, December 8, 2014
Tuesday, December 2, 2014
Marlon with family in Tahiti
Thursday, October 2, 2014
"Apocalypse of Marlon Brando"
Coming soon!! "THE APOCALYPSE OF MARLON BRANDO", a book chronicling the
on-set conversations between Marlon Brando and Francis Ford Coppola
during the filming of Apocalypse Now.
Monday, September 22, 2014
Telluride: Francis Ford Coppola Spills 'Apocalypse Now' Secrets on 35th Anniversary
The following article is from "The Hollywood Reporter" 8/30/14:
Apocalypse Now star Marlon Brando was "like a kid, very
irresponsible," said director Francis Ford Coppola at an Aug. 29 Telluride
Film Festival panel celebrating the 35th anniversary of his Vietnam War
classic, whose $31 million budget — $110 million in 2014 dollars — Coppola had
to finance himself at 17 percent interest, which meant that Brando's behavior
could have bankrupted him. The panel, hosted by Scott Foundas, featured winners
of a dozen Oscars: producer Fred Roos, editor Walter Murch, cinematographer
Vittorio Storaro and writer John Milius.
Since Brando — like co-star Dennis Hopper, who shunned
showers and reeked from cocaine abuse — couldn't memorize a single line (yet
gave an immortal performance), Coppola recorded Brando improvising for five
days, typed up Brando's insightful ramblings along with snatches of Heart of
Darkness, put the lines on tape and gave the 300-pound actor an earphone, so he
could press a button and recite what he heard. "He didn't have a good
memory, that's why he'd say, 'Uh... uh...' and push the button," said
Coppola.
Like Brando's finale, the film's famous opening was also a
desperate improvisation. "I was hanging out with the four or five editors,
just goofing off," said Coppola. Another eyewitness (not on the Telluride
panel) tells The Hollywood Reporter, "Francis was drunk, desperate, and
rummaging around in garbage cans of film saying, 'I've gotta find an opening
scene for my movie!' " Said Coppola, "The 'trim' barrels were filled
with film you threw away. Garbage, basically, thrown-away film turned upside
down and used to space out the sound on the sound track. I reached into a barrel
of this film and at random pulled out a piece of film and put it on the
Moviola. It was a lot of smoke, occasionally you'd see a helicopter skid go by,
just very abstract. For the hell of it, I looked at another bin of trim and one
said 'The End,' The Doors music. I said, 'Oh, wouldn't it be funny if we
started the movie with 'This is the end' at the beginning?' So that's a case of
destiny or just chance that helped make the beginning of the movie."
The opening scene was punctuated with an explosion in the
jungle. "That was the biggest practical explosion ever done on film,"
said editor Murch. "It was the largest, most expensive military film that
was made without any cooperation from the government." Added Coppola,
"[Then] Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld [who later ignited the
Vietnam-like Iraq debacle] categorically refused to allow us [military
equipment and personnel]." However, said Murch, "A lot of ex-soldiers
[from Vietnam] came to advise us, so in a sense it had a different point of
view, rather than the POV of the established military."
Coppola praised Murch for the brilliant segue from the
opening explosion scene to one of Martin Sheen drunk in a Saigon hotel room
whose ceiling fan rhymed with the helicopter blades in the first scene. "I
just made it a fan; Walter ingeniously made it a helicopter," said
Coppola. "Francis said, 'The film needs to get crazier and crazier as it
goes along, and if you work on it for any time, you become crazier,' "
said Murch. "So you have the most normal scene, the beginning, because you
haven't worked on it yet. The irony is that the beginning is arguably more
crazy than anything else in the film."
To make Sheen's character vivid, Coppola relied on a dream.
"I had a dream that somehow the key to getting the actor to disclose all
that was in him was his vanity. Because Martin was a low-key person, such a
good person, a handsome guy, very open, but you sensed that maybe there was a
lot more to him. So I started goading him on his vanity. 'Look at yourself in the
mirror, you're so handsome, look at your face, look at how beautiful you are,'
" said Coppola. "He started to get really weird. He punched his own
image in the mirror, and all this poured out of him."
"Including his blood," said Foundas.
But the gory scene was needed, said Coppola, because Sheen
spends the rest of the movie passively watching horrors of war, and the
audience had to be inside his mind at the start. "This isn't just an
ordinary guy, this is a complicated man who's seen things, has stuff in his
soul and heart that isn't easy to understand."
Storaro said he was reluctant to shoot the film, because he
made philosophical, psychological films like The Conformist, not war movies.
"I said, 'Don't worry, this is not a war movie,' " said Coppola.
Storaro realized Apocalypse Now was about the imposition of one civilization on
another, which he expressed by using light and darkness, unnatural artificial
colors imposed on natural colors. "It was supposed to be like The Guns of
Navarone, but all of a sudden it was about colored smoke and all this
weirdness," said Coppola. "I knew it was my chance to take all my
principles and put it in this incredible fresco that was Apocalypse Now, good
and evil, darkness and light, one culture imposing itself on another."
Telluride Film Festival co-founder Tom Luddy noted that it
was appropriate that the Apocalypse Now panel and 35th anniversary screening
was in the fest's Werner Herzog Theater. "In 1974, I brought Herzog's
Aguirre: The Wrath of God to the Pacific Film Archive at Berkeley and screened
it for Francis, who used two citations from it in Apocalypse Now." Coppola
used homages to Herzog's scenes of a mysterious boat in a tree and a native's
spear that goes through a startled conquistador's chest. "I would like to
say where this movie came from," said Coppola. "I saw Eugene Jones'
1967 A Face of War, a 16 mm documentary about Vietnam, and that had a profound
effect on me. Werner Herzog made Aguirre, and that had a tremendous effect on
me."
Wednesday, July 30, 2014
Marlon on the set of Apocalypse Now
Marlon Brando spent a lot of time with the Ifugao extras on the set of Apocalypse Now, and the indigenous people of the Philippines. Marlon loved and appreciated their non-Western, simplistic way of life. They loved Marlon because he was a warm and kind human being, and not necessarily because he was a big Hollywood star.
Monday, July 21, 2014
Anal sex in Last Tango
Last Tango in
Paris stars Marlon Brando as a grieving window who loses himself in a passionate
anonymous affair with a young French woman - played by Maria Schneider - who is
engaged to another man.
There is much
nudity in the film but the one scene that caused the most controversy was the
one in which Marlon Brando used butter as a lubricant prior to anal sex.
Schneider at the
time of the film gave many frank interviews about her colourful sex life and
appeared to be unconcerned by the uproar the film created but later on she was
to change her stance.
Of the butter
scene she is quoted as saying in a Daily Mail interview: "I should have
called my agent or had my lawyer come to the set because you can't force
someone to do something that isn't in the script, but at the time, I didn't
know that. Marlon said to me: 'Maria, don't worry, it's just a movie,' but
during the scene, even though what Marlon was doing wasn't real, I was crying
real tears. I felt humiliated and to be honest, I felt a little raped, both by
Marlon and by Bertolucci [the director]. After the scene, Marlon didn't console
me or apologise. Thankfully, there was just one take."
She remained
friends with Brando after the film although she admitted they did not speak of
the film as Brando too sought to disassociate himself from the movie.
After her death
Bertolucci said: "Her death came too soon, before I could hold her again
tenderly, and tell her that I felt connected to her as on the first day, and
for once, to ask her to forgive me. Maria accused me of having robbed her of
her youth and only today am I wondering whether there wasn't some truth to
that.”
Wednesday, July 16, 2014
Brando, Coppola, and the Apocalypse that wasn't
It was the late
1970s and one of Hollywood's hottest directors had undertaken an incredible
challenge: to make cinematic sense of America's devastating war in Vietnam. The
film shoot was wildly out of control: typhoons and cost overruns, a death from
an accident on set, and a heart attack suffered by lead actor Martin Sheen. As
some tell it, the biggest of all the problems on the terribly vexed set of
Apocalypse Now was Marlon Brando.
According to
director Francis Ford Coppola, Brando showed up entirely unprepared: he was
grossly overweight, had not read Joseph Conrad's The Heart of Darkness (the
novel upon which the film was based), and was eager to stall the production to
increase his already inflated salary.
Except this is
not what happened. Letters between Brando and Coppola, audios of the two
discussing the film's conception on a houseboat while filming was suspended,
and Brando's personal script, notes, and the many books he read and annotated
for the film -- reveal that Brando not only was well prepared for the
production, but also contributed ideas and script revisions that shaped the
entire film.
Marlon Brando
died on July 1, 2004. Now in the aftermath of the tenth anniversary of his
death, it is time to acknowledge what has been overlooked: that our foremost
American actor had a mind. His curiosity about the world around him was even
greater than his more legendary appetites for women and food.
Contrary to
Coppola's claim, Brando read Conrad's Heart of Darkness (his 4,000 book library
contained multiple editions of the novel). He shaved his head, deliberately, to
suit Conrad's description of Colonel Kurtz, Brando's character, as
"impressively bald."
Brando's reading
to prepare for the film included numerous other books and materials: The
Pentagon Papers, writings by anthropologist James Frazer and philosopher Hannah
Arendt, T.S. Eliot's "Hollow Men," first-person accounts of the U.S.
Vietnam mission, and more.
Coppola
recognized how crucial Brando's knowledge was to his film. Writing the actor
just before he arrived on set, Coppola admitted that directing the film had
become a "nightmare" that he would rely on Brando to get through.
"Together we can accomplish anything," he wrote -- "even make a
movie about Vietnam."
In fact, Coppola
relied on Brando so much that Brando himself -- who had famously remarked that
the only people who could write better acting lines were Tennessee Williams and
Shakespeare -- became uncomfortable with the authority he was granted. As he
wrote to Coppola in a letter, "It's not really my job to be involved in
the overall concept of the script."
Regardless of
Brando's discomfort, audiotapes of discussions between the two confirm that
Coppola drew heavily on Brando's vision of Kurtz, and of the whole film.
Michael Herr,
the Vietnam War novelist who revised the screenplay on set, recalled that
Brando "wrote a stream of brilliant lines for his character." Even
Coppola's biographer, Peter Cowie, notes that Kurtz's domain "houses the
core of the film's meaning, and Kurtz's scenes alight unerringly on the reasons
for the American predicament in Vietnam."
If Coppola in
fact relied heavily on Brando, then why have we been told otherwise? Coppola
needed a scapegoat. By then a world-famous director who had won two Academy
Awards, Coppola this time was in over his head. As the director later admitted,
the film production was akin to its subject -- Vietnam. Instead of focusing on
his inability to control the fiasco, Coppola turned on Brando.
The actor was an
easy target: deeply idiosyncratic and ambivalent toward fame, he made a point
of rejecting his celebrity and exploiting it on behalf of causes he believed
in. In 1973, just after Coppola had won an Academy Award for the adapted
screenplay of The Godfather, Brando had refused to accept the Best Actor Oscar
for his role in the same film. Instead, he sent an Indian emissary -- Apache tribe
member Sacheen Littlefeather -- to decline the award to protest Hollywood's
denigration of American Indians in film. It was an act that won him praise
among activists and aroused contempt in Hollywood.
What better way
for Coppola to absolve himself, then, than to focus on Brando? He knew that
Hollywood, with its resentments toward Brando, would jump on the story, and he
also knew that Brando would not offer a counterargument. In typical fashion,
Brando avoided a public slugfest and instead wrote to Coppola privately to
express his dismay about the betrayal.
This is not to
say that Brando was perfect: as he himself acknowledged, he had many flaws. He
did not weigh 300 pounds in Apocalypse Now as some rumors suggested, but at 210
pounds he was still 30 pounds overweight, the result of an overeating habit
akin to his family's propensity for alcoholism (his parents and sisters were
all alcoholics). More generally, his self-indulgent lifestyle harmed his
children and created untold misery for himself and the many women in his life.
But these
personal qualities should not detract from Brando's legacy. His success was due
not only to looks and talent, but to his extensive preparations for his roles.
He was a genius in the minds of those who directed him (Elia Kazan), those who
wrote for him (Tennessee Williams), and those in a position to know (Laurence
Olivier).
With Brando's
4000-book library, his personal film scripts, his letters, his audio archive --
all available since his death -- we now have the documents to debunk the myths
surrounding him, and give America's greatest actor credit for his contribution
to the history of film.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)